Tips For Writing An Interrogative Essay

Tips For Writing An Interrogative EssayWhen writing an interrogative essay, there are a number of steps you need to take in order to ensure that the essay flows naturally and a successful conclusion is drawn. By following these steps you will ensure that the essay comes out properly and flows better than it did at the start.The first step is to ensure that the introduction comes first. In the opening sentence you should ask a question and then follow it up with a statement that explains the question. If the question you ask in the introduction can be answered in the first sentence then it is a good idea to do so.You should then proceed to write a question and answer the same question in the second sentence. This will create a strong outline and help you to make your statements flow better. The first sentence also sets the tone for the rest of the essay and shows that you are being straightforward.Next you need to make a short sentence that explains the question in the first sentence. Again this is key to making your essay flow well. A question should then follow and then conclude. Make sure you explain the purpose of the question and what you intend to do with the answer.Then you need to outline the rest of the paragraph using the sentences you have just written. The way to put this in is to have the main question and the conclusion.You then need to be sure to stay on topic as well as the thesis statement that you have already written. If you find yourself shifting from one topic to another, you should address the issue quickly and move back to the topic you were originally intending to use the next paragraph.Finally you need to write the conclusion in the last sentence. This should give you a chance to summarize your whole paragraph and hopefully bring some clarity to the matter. If you are unable to move onto a new topic because you feel that the conclusions are not clear enough, then you should consider turning the article into a full-length paper.The goal o f this interrogative essay sample is to help you structure the essay properly and make sure that you keep your sentences neat and focus on your thesis statement. As long as you stick to the above steps, you should find that you will be able to have a success rate with your essays.

Capital Punishment`s Cost Essays - Penology, Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment`s Cost How do you feel about the saying, "an eye for an eye?" Do you feel that it is a good saying to run a nation by? Or do you agree with Gandhi who added to that statement, "--and everyone is blind?" There have been many controversies in the history of the United States, ranging from abortion to gun control; however, capital punishment has been one of the most hotly contested issues in recent decades. Capital Punishment is the execution of a criminal pursuant to a sentence of death imposed by a competent court. It is not intended to inflict any physical pain or any torture; it is only another form of punishment. This form of punishment is irrevocable because it removes those punished from society permanently, instead of temporarily imprisoning them, this is the best and most effective way to deal with criminals. The usual alternative to the death penalty is life-long imprisonment. Capital punishment is a method of retributive punishment as old as civilization itself. The death penalty has been imposed throughout history for many crimes, ranging from blasphemy and treason to petty theft and murder. Many ancient societies accepted the idea that certain crimes deserved capital punishment. Ancient Roman and Mosaic Law endorsed the notion of retaliation; they believed in the rule of "an eye for an eye." Similarly, the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Greeks all executed citizens for a variety of crimes. The most famous people who were executed were Socrates (Saunders 462) and Jesus. Only in England, during the reigns of King Canute (1016-1035; Hoyt 151) and William the Conqueror (1066-1087; Miller 259) was the death penalty not used, although the results of interrogation and torture were often fatal. Later, Britain reinstated the death penalty and brought it to its American colonies. Although the death penalty was widely accepted throughout the early United States, not everyone approved of it. In the late-eighteenth century, opposition to the death penalty gathered enough strength to lead to important restrictions on the use of the death penalty in several northern states, while in the United States, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Rhode Island abandoned the practice altogether. In 1794, Pennsylvania adopted a law to distinguish the degrees of murder and only use the death penalty for premeditated first-degree murder. Another reform took place in 1846 in Louisiana. This state abolished the mandatory death penalty and authorized the option of sentencing a capital offender to life imprisonment rather than to death. After the 1830s, public executions ceased to be demonstrated but did not completely stop until after 1936. Throughout history, governments have been extremely inventive in devising ways to execute people. Executions inflicted in the past are now regarded today as ghastly, barbaric, and unthinkable and are forbidden by law almost everywhere. Common historical methods of execution included: stoning, crucifixion, burning, breaking on the wheel, drawing and quartering, beheading and decapitation, shooting, and hanging. These types of punishments today are banned by the eighth amendment to the constitution (The Constitution, Amendment 8). In the United States, the death penalty is currently implemented in one of five ways: firing squad, hanging, gas chamber, electrocution, and lethal injection. These methods of execution compared to those of the past are not meant for torture, but meant for punishment for the crime. For the past decades, capital punishment has been one of the most hotly contested political issues in America. This debate is a complicated one. Capital punishment is a legal, practical, philosophical, social, political, and moral question. The notion of deterrence has been at the very center of the practical debate over the question of capital punishment. Most of us assume that we execute murderers primarily because we believe it will discourage others from becoming murderers. Retentionists have long asserted the deterrent power of capital punishment as an obvious fact. The fear of death deters people from committing crimes. Still, abolitionists believe that deterrence is little more than an assumption and a naive assumption at that. Abolitionists claim that capital punishment does not deter murderers from killing or killing again. They base most of their argument against deterrence on statistics. States that use capital punishment extensively show a higher murder rate than those that have abolished the death penalty. Also, states that have abolished the death penalty and then reinstated it show no significant change in murder rate. They say adjacent states with the death penalty and those without show no long-term differences in the number of murders that occur in that state. And finally, there has been no record of change in the rate of homicides